Removes all context filters in the table except filters that have been applied to the specified columns. I hope this is helpful. The February 2017 version of Power BI Desktop introduced a new DAX function, called TREATAS, which will appear in future version of Analysis Services and Excel. An alternative approach to the ALL filter described in the previous section is using a CROSSJOIN over all the values of the two columns. More info about Internet Explorer and Microsoft Edge. I have tables and relatins like like. any suggestions? Dragon Fruit USERELATIONSHIP ( , ). Read more, This article describes how to use the Group By Columns property to store the slicer selection by using the same column used in a SWITCH function to optimize the query performance. Read more, This article describes how to implement a DAX measure to run faster than what you get from the built-in fusion optimization. Thus, if you have a slicer filtering the brand Proseware, you will see the sales amount of only the products Red belonging to Proseware brand, ignoring any product of the Contoso brand. Why is my arxiv paper not generating an arxiv watermark? CALCULATE - More than 1 filter criteria on the same column I need to calculate a measure and for doing so need to apply multiple filters to obtain the desired value. They are related to the data types and the operation being performed: knowing these details helps you write more robust DAX formulas and avoid errors in comparisons. Are you able to assist? Returns multiple rows which are positioned within the given interval. This is the syntax using KEEPFILTERS: The SUMMARIZE function generates a list of the existing combinations between two or more columns, and can be used with columns belonging to different tables if they are connected in a many-to-one relationships chain. I want to filter across two columns based on their string value to produce a new table showing the complete row of data that fit both criteria. CALCULATETABLE function (DAX) - DAX | Microsoft Learn You can use the CALCULATE function with your conditions. Dont know of a more elegant way to achieve this but maybe this will do. I'm fairly new to Power BI and could really use some help. Just to recap, we have two patterns in DAX to manage virtual relationships. Heres another approach that is worth taking a look at: This article describes how to create a slicer showing the values of multiple columns, applying the filter on any of the underlying columns. Would My Planets Blue Sun Kill Earth-Life? The performance is slightly better, but the advantage is limited to an improved query plan in the formula engine, without reducing the redundant materializations required by this approach: The approach using TREATAS is not much different to INTERSECT, besides the syntax and the order of arguments: The performance is the best one for a virtual relationship, mainly because this approach reduces the storage engine workload from three large materialization to only two, and this also improves the performance of the formula engine: The physical relationship is the best approach. rev2023.5.1.43405. Measure = IF (IF (CALCULATE (MAXX ('Table','Table' [Revision]),ALLEXCEPT ('Table','Table' [Status],'Table' [Project ID]))=MAXX ('Table','Table' [Revision]),1,0)=1,SUM ('Table' [Budget])) Create a table like . Thank you for this answer- specifically related to using "in ("value", "value", "value", . However the total value for this measure is incorrect in . This topic contains 1 reply, has 2 voices, and was last updated by tomallan 6 years, 9 months ago. && 'Back Charge Data'[Selling Brand] in {"Drafting", "Engineering"}). In the following picture, you see that the Total Advertising computes a correct computation month by month, whereas the column AdvertisingAmount simply sums the value of the corresponding column for all the rows in Advertising, because there is no filter propagation between Date (which has a month selected in every row of the report) and Advertising. Read more, This article introduces the Data Ecosystem, an innovative evolution of the modern data warehouse architecture. DAX FILTER with multiple criteria - Power BI The relationship is defined by naming, as arguments, the two columns that serve as endpoints. The approach using INTERSECT has a simpler DAX syntax. The filter expression has two parts: the first part names the table to which the filter applies. Consider a model where the Sales table has a day granularity, whereas the table Advertising has a month granularity. I used the suggested measure and used a slicer for status but cannot Hi Raymond, The measure can still work with the separate columns. Optimizing DAX expressions involving multiple measures - SQLBI This might help: https://community.powerbi.com/t5/Desktop/Import-Excel-Pivot-to-PowerBI-Possible/td-p/136729 DAX - Sum of values based on conditions from other columnxlsx, https://community.powerbi.com/t5/Desktop/Import-Excel-Pivot-to-PowerBI-Possible/td-p/136729. The best one depends on the cardinality of the table and of the columns involved in the filter. CALCULATE(. The measure can still work with the separate columns. CROSSJOIN ( [, [, ] ] ), Keep me informed about BI news and upcoming articles with a bi-weekly newsletter (uncheck if you prefer to proceed without signing up for the newsletter), Send me SQLBI promotions (only 1 or 2 emails per year). How to Create Joins in DAX with/without Relationships - Medium Something like this should work: I don't see anything necessarily wrong with your DAX although it would be a bit more efficient to write it like this: Can you explain what you mean by "my DAX doesn't work"? Creates a summary of the input table grouped by the specified columns. Help on DAX calculate/complex filtering on multiple columns. You have a number of options to specify a complex filter in a CALCULATE statement. Find out more about the April 2023 update. I was wondering if you can help me. The correct statement will look like, Assuming that the STATUS comes from a slicer, this would also be possible, Maybe this idea helps you give another idea, Thank you for all your contributions to this site. Specifying multiple filter conditions in CALCULATE - SQLBI If the null hypothesis is never really true, is there a point to using a statistical test without a priori power analysis? ALL ( [] [, [, [, ] ] ] ). How can I list the tables in a SQLite database file that was opened with ATTACH? The bidirectional filter enabled between YearMonths and Date guarantees that the filter context propagates from Date to YearMonth, and then it also goes to Advertising because of the one-to-many relationship between YearMonths and Advertising. I don't know your data model. The lookup functions work by using tables and relationships, like a database. You can appreciate different performance only on larger data models. Returns all the rows in a table, or all the values in a column, ignoring any filters that might have been applied. Are you looking for a version that replaces local filters rather than adding to them like this? I am trying to create a new metric "# Orders" with different filters: * on column "KPI", sum only the KPI called "# Orders". DAX Multiple filters across multiple columns to produce new table I have added the data model to the question. Find rows that have the same value on a column in MySQL, Power BI, filter taking into account multiple columns, Power bi client filter with multiple columns, My question is about calculating an indicator based on column total using DAX, Create a column with dynamic values based on selected value of slicer. The YearMonth calculated column simply combines year and month number in a single value. Hi, You caould use Countrows with filter lets say that your column name is A and your table name is Table1 the dax will be =countrows (filter (table1,table1 [A]="Yes")) and lets say that you have more than value in your column A and you want to count each one then use = COUNTROWS (FILTER (Table1,Table1 [A] =EARLIER (Table1 . Returns a single row that is positioned either before or after the. The virtual relationship using the FILTER technique is implemented using the following query. What is more important, you will not override the existing filter on such a column. However, it requires the relationship to be defined in the data model. The condition is evaluated row by row on top the specified table and only the rows satisfying the condition will be returned as a result. The result of a filter argument is always a table with one or more columns, and the cost of the filter is the number of rows you have in such a table. This could be expensive for low cardinality columns in a large table. In this case, the cardinality of the filter can be lower than the Cartesian product of the values you have in the referenced columns. In such scenarios, you can create a new column with a combination of multiple columns and use it in a relationship. In fact, the result of Total Advertising now corresponds to the result of the column AdvertisingAmount in the report, which implicitly aggregates the corresponding column in the Advertising table using the SUM aggregation function. If you can filter "other" table by one column by label then use relationship; Relationship between which two columns on which tables? If the relationship is a many-to-many, you can implement the pattern described in the article Many-to-many relationships in Power BI and Excel 2016. If you are used to the INTERSECT pattern, you might find the TREATAS syntax strange, because you must invert the arguments: the first one is the filter context to read, the second one includes the columns. When you write a CALCULATE statement, all the filter arguments are table expressions, such as a list of values for one or more columns, or for an entire table. If this post helps, then please consider Accept it as the solution to help the other members find it more quickly. My model is attached. Something like this should work: Back Charge Int.Cost =. Find out more about the April 2023 update. For example, If I wanted to filter by Apples, I would need to select multiple Apples values from Label Label 1 Label 2 and Label 4. In other words, we are simulating the scenario of a large dimension by using the smallest possible data model. The second part of the formula, FILTER(table, expression), tells SUMX which data to use. DAX - FILTER() - When, Why, & How to Use It - P3 Adaptive Would I need to make a relationship between the two? CROSSFILTER ( , , ). (Ep. I am quite new to Powerpivot so please be kind. For example, when you write: In reality the filter expression you wrote is transformed in: This behavior is identical for all the filter arguments of CALCULATE and CALCULATETABLE. The slower performance of a virtual relationship shouldnt impact the overall execution time in a visible way, but remember that your experience might vary depending on the complexity of the query. Most of the times, you can move a filter from a SUMMARIZECOLUMNS argument Read more, SUMMARIZE is a very powerful and very complex function to use. I think the way you have it, you are concatenating all the values into 1 string, which doesn't exist. I have come across a similar problem and your above solution works perfect for me. Find out about what's going on in Power BI by reading blogs written by community members and product staff. chicago_sales_amount = CALCULATE (SUM ('Table' [SalesAmount]);column [1]= "sales" && (column [2] = "chicago" || column [2] = "sanfranciso" || column [2] = "newyork" || column [2] = "hoston")) This above expression will . I am trying to do a CALCULATE with a filter based on a related table. Generating points along line with specifying the origin of point generation in QGIS.